Poker players sue to get to the bottom of online cheating scheme

Eight poker players who say they were victims of a cheating scheme on the popular Ultimate Bet website are suing a Canadian company and unnamed individuals, alleging they violated U.S. laws aimed at combatting organized crime, defrauded players and negligently offered crooked card games.

The lawsuit, filed last Friday in U.S. District Court in California, alleges that the defendants — 6356095 Canada Inc., formerly known as Excapsa Software Inc., and up to 10 Jane or John Does — violated the federal Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act, committed fraud and exhibited negligence by enabling the theft of at least $20 million from high-stakes poker players who gambled on the Ultimate Bet website.

It seeks compensation of at least $1.73 million and far more in punitive damages on behalf of the plaintiffs: Daniel Ashman, Brad Booth, Thomas Koral, Greg Lavery, Dave Lizmi, Daniel Smith, Joseph Sanders and Dustin Woolf.

Possibly more important in unraveling the longstanding mystery of the largest known case of online poker cheating, the lawsuit seeks documentation that Ultimate Bet's shadowy parent companies and regulators with the Kahnawake Gaming Commission (KGC) have never made public.


The KGC, the regulatory agency of the Mohawk Council of Kahnawake in southern Ontario, announced in September 2008 that its investigation found that a single individual — former World Series of Poker champ Russ Hamilton  — was behind the cheating case. But many players believe that it was the result of a broader conspiracy.

Among them is Haley Hintze, a former writer and editor of PokerNews and now a poker blogger who is working on a book on the cheating scheme due out by summer. In it, she told msnbc.com on Thursday, she will identify at least three others who directly participated in the theft and attempts to cover it up.

Representatives of Excapsa Software could not be reached for comment on the lawsuit. A spokesman for the KGC had no comment on the lawsuit or whether it would respond to any subpoenas.

Ultimate Bet acknowledged that $20 million was stolen from players at the site between 2003 and 2008 through the use of a "backdoor" in the gaming software that allowed the cheater or cheaters to see opponents hole cards in high stakes tournaments. The operators of Ultimate Bet refunded most or all of that money.

But the suit alleges that the company “substantially underestimated” the losses by failing to consider money that wasn’t wagered when the cheaters realized their opponent had them beat.

Read 2008 story about the case: Poker site cheating plot a high-stakes whodunit

“The key to the massive success of the cheating players is not simply that they were able to profit by bluffing when their opponent was weak or betting when they had the best hand, but that they were able to fold and not play … whenever their hand was strong (but) not the best,” it argues. “Thus every time a player had a flush, the cheater would fold a lower flush or straight; every time a player had a full house, the cheaters would fold a flush.”

“There are significant doubts about the methodology of the refunds given to players,” said Alan Engle, a partner in the Meador & Engle law firm in Anaheim Hills, Calif., who filed the suit. “That’s always been a closed process and there are inherent difficulties in calculating the amount of the theft.”

Engle said the early part of the case will probably focus on jurisdictional issues, but he said he is confident that he can prevail on any challenges because Ultimate Bet focused its marketing on U.S. bettors.

“Anyone victimized by someone in a foreign nation over the Internet is in no way required to bring a case in a foreign nation,” he said.

Excapsa Software, now known as 6356095 Canada Inc., is currently in the midst of liquidation proceedings in Canada.

Sheldon Krakower, who is handling the corporate dismemberment for XMT Liquidations of Montreal, said he would soon seek guidance from the Ontario court overseeing the case before responding to the lawsuit.

“We will be filing our seventh report to the Ontario court specifically addressing this matter imminently,” he told msnbc.com on Thursday. “… We need direction from the court on that.”

In a report to Excapsa shareholders in May 2011, Krakower indicated that $7 million U.S. had recently been released to shareholders, and that $4.2 million was being held in escrow until the end of the year. It is not clear whether that money remains in escrow.

Ultimate Bet, which merged with another online gaming site, Absolute Poker, in 2008 to form the Cereus Poker network, was among a handful of online Poker sites that had their U.S. operations shut down in April of last year when the U.S. Justice Department indicted them on charges of violating the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act of 2006, money laundering and other charges. The feds also froze bank accounts holding the bankrolls of U.S. players, many of whom have yet to be repaid.

Discuss this post

Jump to discussion page: 1 2 3

Did anyone actually think online poker was honest?

  • 54 votes
#1 - Fri Jan 20, 2012 7:27 AM EST

Exactly. I'm shocked, shocked, to find that cheating is going on in here!

  • 24 votes
#1.1 - Fri Jan 20, 2012 7:53 AM EST

..... exactly why online voting in elections should never be allowed.

  • 31 votes
#1.2 - Fri Jan 20, 2012 8:37 AM EST

The plaintiffs want money because the company "failed to consider money that wasn’t wagered when the cheaters realized their opponent had them beat."

This means I can sue a real casino to get back money on a wager I never made? The House always wins anyway...

  • 5 votes
#1.3 - Fri Jan 20, 2012 8:44 AM EST

$20 million

And they were betting significant amounts of money at these games. Unbelievable!

  • 4 votes
#1.4 - Fri Jan 20, 2012 9:23 AM EST
Comment author avatarDick-2100935Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

On line voting for elections doesn't work like playing 5 card stud. The only thing in common is the poker face presented by the candidates and you not knowing what they really will do. But I will try to see if I have it right. I have a flush and you have a straight flush, if I fold will your candidate become president? Or if you raise me and win do you get two votes? Help me out here.

One thing for sure is any voting method has got to be better than what goes on in Florida!

  • 8 votes
#1.5 - Fri Jan 20, 2012 9:31 AM EST

Actually, it means that if someone is looking at your hand, and you have them beat (but they would have bet otherwise) then you were cheated out of money that you would have won...

That's one of the things they are suing about. The other is that they want it made public how deep the cheating scandal went and how the refunds were calculated.

  • 12 votes
#1.6 - Fri Jan 20, 2012 9:43 AM EST
  • 1 vote
#1.7 - Fri Jan 20, 2012 10:09 AM EST

I hear a very small violin playing. I have little sympathy for anyone willing to gamble with a siginificant amount of money. These days I guess that includes the stock market, too, since everything there also seems to be rigged.

  • 11 votes
#1.8 - Fri Jan 20, 2012 10:18 AM EST

Exactly Paul. I love to gamble, but sure as hell would not do it online..

  • 4 votes
#1.9 - Fri Jan 20, 2012 11:00 AM EST

Oh, poor thing, lost your money, if you can't afford to lose don't play ... Suck it up boys its only money we can make more ...

  • 3 votes
#1.10 - Fri Jan 20, 2012 11:32 AM EST

Nice Casablanca reference, Early Out!

Your winnings, sir.

Oh, thank you very much.

  • 1 vote
#1.11 - Fri Jan 20, 2012 12:30 PM EST

Poker at the higher levels is about calculated risk, not gambling. Also, poker is a game of player against player, not against the house so the broader online poker industry wants to be more honest. The poker sites depend on rake and buy in fees for revenue. If no one plays on their site due to questions of integrity or collusion, then that site will not generate money (see free market).

  • 3 votes
#1.12 - Fri Jan 20, 2012 1:09 PM EST

One of the first things which "should" happen is to deny server placement on native reserves such as Kahnawake This also happened at Cahnawoga on the south shore of Montreal. Since the Federal Government has no jurisdiction on these lands, unscrupulous individuals offer the natives lucrative funding to host the servers. These rules were installed to protect the integrity/individuality of the native reserves but as always happens, the situation is taken advantage of by some. Who knows how many more "internet scams" are being conducted from these locations?

  • 5 votes
#1.13 - Fri Jan 20, 2012 1:11 PM EST

White man steal land. We steal money back online. WC Fields was right there is a sucker born every minute. Does anyone really believe that the slots, poker and blackjack machines in a casino are honest? Just like tic tac toe the only winning move is not to play.

  • 2 votes
#1.14 - Fri Jan 20, 2012 1:20 PM EST

I am a Nevada attorney who has been practicing in Las Vegas for 27 years. Unequivocally, you are an idiot if you play online poker! Use your brains people!

  • 2 votes
#1.15 - Fri Jan 20, 2012 1:27 PM EST

LMAO lets see you were doing some thing illegal on line, got cheated and now want to use legal means to make an attorney rich and get your money back Blahahahahaha

  • 3 votes
#1.16 - Fri Jan 20, 2012 2:13 PM EST

Now that's taking a gamble.......such fools.......

    #1.17 - Fri Jan 20, 2012 3:05 PM EST

    How could this possibly happen - I thought that all poker players were inherently honest. lol

    While I enjoy playing poker on-line at one of the free poker sites, only an idiot would gamble their hard-earned money with shysters. They deserve to have their money stolen/confiscated.

    These 'gamblers' made poor bets.

    • 1 vote
    #1.18 - Sat Jan 21, 2012 12:21 PM EST

    I thought gambling online was illegal. No wait, the government has realized the amount of money it can earn by participating in it. You can bet the house there'll be cheating in those games too.

    • 1 vote
    #1.19 - Sat Jan 21, 2012 12:56 PM EST
    Reply

    It is hard enough playing face to face and winning. Why would anyone think it would be easier online?

    • 7 votes
    Reply#2 - Fri Jan 20, 2012 7:30 AM EST

    people who say that online poker is rigged are the ones who don't profit off of it. this is only one case that there has been cheating involved.

    • 5 votes
    #2.1 - Fri Jan 20, 2012 8:54 AM EST

    No there was another highly publicized cheating ring a few years ago out of the Caribbean. The cheaters were able to actually see your hand. Either way online gambling is illegal I don't think they should get the money back. They broke the law. That would be like me selling drugs and getting cheated because someone scammed me and then trying to sue. I wouldn't trust a computer program that another company came up with to be honest about the cards especially when that company's sole business is making money off you losing at cards.

    • 1 vote
    #2.2 - Fri Jan 20, 2012 1:03 PM EST

    That you know of , Tru. That is the point. You can't know how honest the game is. At least in a actually real poker game you can watch the deck, the shuffle, and the deal. For all you know the game is being run by some "Nigerian Prince".

    • 1 vote
    #2.3 - Fri Jan 20, 2012 1:23 PM EST

    Hell, they don't have to cheat...by not being tightly regulated from a government agency they can write any dealing algorithm program they want instead of making the deal out purely random. Deal someone 4 of a kind and another a straight flush and another aces full boat and watch the betting fly while the house takes the rake from huge wagers. Bad beats happen far more often online due to these dealing algorithms while making it impossible to know what odds to play. Online poker playing is for amusement only until they are tightly regulated with everything above board....and even then don't bet the farm.

    • 1 vote
    #2.5 - Fri Jan 20, 2012 7:44 PM EST
    Reply

    I can't imagine betting online. They cheat you at the casinos.

    • 6 votes
    Reply#3 - Fri Jan 20, 2012 7:42 AM EST

    Hey Mary Jones, you are correct, but at least you get free drinks at the Casino's...LOL

    • 6 votes
    #3.1 - Fri Jan 20, 2012 12:54 PM EST
    Reply

    A fool and his money is soon parted.

    • 17 votes
    Reply#4 - Fri Jan 20, 2012 7:44 AM EST

    you must get your quotes right,,,it is " a fool and his money are some party" now that I have brightened up your day I can go back to bed

    • 4 votes
    #4.1 - Fri Jan 20, 2012 7:53 AM EST

    Or my favorite variation "a fool and his money are soon elected"

    • 10 votes
    #4.2 - Fri Jan 20, 2012 9:07 AM EST

    " A fool can spank his monkey and become president "

    • 1 vote
    #4.3 - Fri Jan 20, 2012 11:03 AM EST

    "A fool did spank his monkey and became president"

    • 1 vote
    #4.4 - Fri Jan 20, 2012 3:23 PM EST
    Reply

    Gambling is a addiction and just like other addictions it can be self destructive if not controlled. Allowing online gambling makes it just too easy for addicts, if you had to travel to feed your addiction it would make it just a little harder witch means it might be a little easier to control. Noticed state govts are starting to encourage more gambling, just to close some revenue holes, what a short sighted solution that is.

    • 1 vote
    Reply#5 - Fri Jan 20, 2012 7:45 AM EST

    Addicts will find other ways to gamble...either in their bedrooms (online), local underground games, their local stationary stores (scratch cards, lotteries, etc.), state-owned race tracks/slot parlors, or in legal casinos. Believe me...they WILL find a way.

    Poker is a skill game over the long run. If you put two players together at a legimitate poker game, where one player is better than the other, and the two players were to play exactly the same way each and every hand, the better player CANNOT lose over the long run. It is mathematically impossible...just as "the house" will never lose with Nevada-style casino games (e.g. black jack, craps, etc) over the long run. Thus...

    To the US Government...for the love of God:

    -Legalize online poker in the US

    -Open up online poker licensure to the general public with a moratorium like California did (subject to extensive criminal background checks of course)

    -Regulate the online poker environment

    -Force the owners of the US online poker sites to provide access to the software code for random analysis by regulators, statisticians, mathematicians, poker experts, software development experts, IT security experts, etc.

    -Tax the heck out of the owners of the US online poker sites (e.g. 24%)

    -Watch the US debt get paid down

    -Watch new tech jobs get created (developers, testers, product managers, etc.) as the result of this new endeavor

    -Watch business owners (large and small) thrive by providing clean games on the internet

    Oh I forgot, corporate-owned casinos will never allow politicans vote this into law. Sorry to have wasted everyone's time with my comment.

    • 19 votes
    #5.1 - Fri Jan 20, 2012 9:56 AM EST

    Mr. Varney,

    I couldn't have said it better myself...

    • 1 vote
    #5.2 - Fri Jan 20, 2012 10:12 AM EST

    What about those of us that aren't addicts, and enjoy gaming online? Should we make sure beer-stores are 300 miles from any residential areas, to protect the alcoholics??

    • 6 votes
    #5.3 - Fri Jan 20, 2012 10:38 AM EST

    *Yawn...*

      #5.4 - Fri Jan 20, 2012 12:33 PM EST

      Mr. Varney,

      Thanks, a post worth the time to read...

      • 3 votes
      #5.5 - Fri Jan 20, 2012 12:56 PM EST

      H2 Gambling Capital, the leading supplier of data and market intelligence
      regarding the global gambling industry, projected in a report released last year
      that regulating all forms of Internet gambling except sports wagering in the
      U.S. would generate a gross expenditure of $67 billion over five years and
      25,470 new jobs...

      I'm not sure of the date on this article but I remember Rep Steve Cohen being a co-sponser on it.

      Cohen is the Representative from Tennessee that spearheaded the passing of Powerball and lottery legislation in Tennessee. Which was no small feat.

      I'd like to see this legislation put in place. Not sure of its status.

      ...In introducing the legislation, Rep. Barton indicated that strong grassroots
      support from constituents was a leading influence in his decision to take on
      this issue. Public pressure for regulated online gambling has increased
      significantly over the past few months in light of the Department of Justice's
      indictment and removal of a number of major online poker operators.

      In addition to Rep. Barton's bill, the Internet Gambling Regulation, Consumer
      Protection, and Enforcement Act (H.R. 1174), which would regulate all forms of
      Internet gambling activity except sports wagering, was introduced in March by
      Rep. John Campbell (R-CA). Also pending is a bill introduced by Rep. Jim
      McDermott (D-WA) earlier this month, the Internet Gambling Regulation and Tax
      Enforcement Act of 2011 (H.R. 2230), which would ensure that taxes and fees are
      collected from wagers placed over the Internet.

      • 1 vote
      #5.6 - Fri Jan 20, 2012 4:47 PM EST

      In the case of poker, only the rake needs taxation as it's player vs player money...not player vs "house" money.

        #5.7 - Fri Jan 20, 2012 7:26 PM EST
        Reply

        Hell I worry about my money every time I purchase something on the net. Why the hell am I going to believe gambling on the net is hones. I rather play the ponies on OTB and get my money then risk it on some software that can be manipulated by people I can't see!

        • 3 votes
        Reply#6 - Fri Jan 20, 2012 7:46 AM EST

        I was able to win. You just had to realize that not only were you playing against other people, you were also playing against the site, adjusting your play accordingly. I folded a straight flush once because I had the low end and I knew the other player had the high end. When I folded I showed, then he showed, and I was right. Everyday that the government wastes not legalizing online poker, it's losing millions. The debt could be paid of in a year by just legalizing and regulating online poker.

        • 5 votes
        Reply#7 - Fri Jan 20, 2012 7:47 AM EST

        Exactly right on both points. You can't play real solid poker all the time because you are playing against players AND a program. If (and when) someone like Harrahs / Ceasars starts a legal online site with a real life mathematical poker program, U.S. players, along with others, will flood the site. All the taxes will easily pay down the debt.

        • 4 votes
        #7.1 - Fri Jan 20, 2012 8:56 AM EST

        polfnikufesin

        "I folded a straight flush once because I had the low end and I knew the other player had the high end."

        How did you know ?? Ahem......

        • 1 vote
        #7.2 - Fri Jan 20, 2012 11:24 AM EST

        BS,

        If you don't know about intuition, don't play poker!

        • 2 votes
        #7.3 - Fri Jan 20, 2012 12:35 PM EST
        Reply

        You gotta know when to foldem,know when to hold em,know when to walk away,kow when to run.

        I would say these cheaters are running pretty fast right now.

        • 5 votes
        Reply#8 - Fri Jan 20, 2012 7:49 AM EST
        Comment author avatarFreakz11114via Facebook

        No one here in Canada cares about your American laws.

        • 5 votes
        Reply#9 - Fri Jan 20, 2012 7:49 AM EST

        Karma... my son... karma

        • 7 votes
        #9.1 - Fri Jan 20, 2012 8:14 AM EST

        same goes about canada's laws

        • 6 votes
        #9.2 - Fri Jan 20, 2012 8:25 AM EST

        Yeah... Well... Duh?

          #9.3 - Fri Jan 20, 2012 9:05 AM EST

          had to laugh at the canadian poster. its funny because if it werent for the united states below it, canada could be invaded and over thrown by an angry troop of girl scouts.

          • 10 votes
          #9.4 - Fri Jan 20, 2012 9:22 AM EST

          Up your yankee ass ! Canada is superior in soooooo many ways. Read your history books you ingrate.

          • 1 vote
          #9.5 - Fri Jan 20, 2012 9:47 AM EST

          how cold is it in canada...

            #9.6 - Fri Jan 20, 2012 10:13 AM EST

            Canada is a joke! Can't go fishing up there because of a D.U.I that I got 15 years ago!

              #9.7 - Fri Jan 20, 2012 10:30 AM EST

              @schoolyard,

              No Kidding ??? What's up with that ??

                #9.8 - Fri Jan 20, 2012 11:14 AM EST

                Don't get a DUI, there or anywhere, that's simple. Here, you'd still be driving after twenty of them. We need stricter laws for that too.

                • 1 vote
                #9.9 - Fri Jan 20, 2012 11:18 AM EST

                My stepson lost his license for 10 years after his 3rd one...I guess you can still drive after 20 of them but illegally I would suppose...In my opinion .08 is way to low for the legal limit, and sobriety check points should be illegal ...

                  #9.10 - Fri Jan 20, 2012 11:30 AM EST

                  I could care less about Canada but they were the first country to kick our ass in war.

                  • 1 vote
                  #9.11 - Fri Jan 20, 2012 11:55 AM EST

                  Is this why 98% of all Canadians live within 100 miles of the us border.

                    #9.12 - Fri Jan 20, 2012 12:37 PM EST
                    Reply

                    I'd rather play in person than online. If cheating in person is easy, imagine how easy it is online.

                    • 1 vote
                    Reply#10 - Fri Jan 20, 2012 8:10 AM EST

                    Here in Nevada, within the live (face to face) poker community, there's a saying:

                    If you play online, you're either a cheater or you're being cheated.

                    • 8 votes
                    Reply#11 - Fri Jan 20, 2012 8:12 AM EST

                    never heard that saying in my life.

                    • 2 votes
                    #11.1 - Fri Jan 20, 2012 8:56 AM EST
                    Reply
                    RaggaHDeleted

                    This is why they call it on line GAMBLING!!!!!!!!!!!!! Believe you can win big on line and I can give you the Easter Bunnys home phone number or perhaps the tooth fairy!

                    • 2 votes
                    Reply#13 - Fri Jan 20, 2012 8:35 AM EST

                    I'll take those numbers. Both of them have stiffed me over the years and I'd like to complain. But make it quick, I'm trying to bluff my way into winning this hand w/ a pair of 3s. I am so buying an island w/ my riches!

                    :D :D

                    • 2 votes
                    #13.1 - Fri Jan 20, 2012 10:08 AM EST
                    Reply

                    This story should be considered a 'reminder', not 'breaking news.'

                    • 2 votes
                    Reply#14 - Fri Jan 20, 2012 8:37 AM EST

                    Isn't Internet gambling illegal? Don't the plaintiffs incriminate themselves by filing the suit?

                      Reply#15 - Fri Jan 20, 2012 8:46 AM EST

                      And yet, it's still not half as funny as the drug dealer who calls 911 to say he got robbed by a buyer.

                      • 3 votes
                      #15.1 - Fri Jan 20, 2012 10:10 AM EST
                      Reply

                      Freakz11114 actually thinks Canada is real country and not the 51st state.I think that is just so-o-o-o-o cute!!!

                      • 2 votes
                      Reply#16 - Fri Jan 20, 2012 8:50 AM EST

                      And that would make Mexico the 52nd

                        #16.1 - Fri Jan 20, 2012 2:16 PM EST
                        Reply

                        You were illegally betting on an illegal, international gambling site, lost your money and now you have the balls to sue?

                        Too bad. Don't gamble. You could have gone to the casino and lost that money just as easily.

                        • 1 vote
                        Reply#17 - Fri Jan 20, 2012 8:51 AM EST

                        I have won a considerable amount of cash playing on-line poker. I have a friend who won over 100K in one year of playing. I know several players that have had success. I have also encountered many, many so-called players who have absolutely no business playing poker.....period! Unless you know how to play the game, you should not play. These idiots (fish) are just pumping the pot for the players who do know how to play. I also wonder why these AMERICAN players are even playing.....isn't it illegal in the U.S.? I will admit however, that great caution should be adhered to when it comes to playing on-line, as their ARE professional players playing amongst the novice and inexperienced players, and they know how to extract your cash..............

                          Reply#18 - Fri Jan 20, 2012 8:51 AM EST

                          the business model encourages cheating. more players = more pots = more rakes. the websites are at an advantage to "help" weaker players so they don't get discouraged and leave. i've seen some incredibly stupid plays get rewarded my miracles. so if you play, play with thier money - not your own!!!!

                            Reply#19 - Fri Jan 20, 2012 8:53 AM EST

                            thats why they call it gambling

                            • 1 vote
                            Reply#20 - Fri Jan 20, 2012 9:01 AM EST

                            These idiots deserve to have their money stolen!!! Anybody who would gamble that amount of money using an online anonymous website is a complete fool and a sucker.

                            • 2 votes
                            Reply#21 - Fri Jan 20, 2012 9:04 AM EST

                            Are you kidding me? Who is STUPID enough to think online gambling is on the up and up? I heard it's ran by the Super Committee.

                            • 1 vote
                            Reply#22 - Fri Jan 20, 2012 9:09 AM EST

                            This is what scares me about online poker. There is just no way to know what's going on behind the scenes. It is certainly possible for online poker to be fair for everybody. The site just takes a small percentage of each pot and simply acts as a random card generator. However, I would think it would be too tempting to alter the program to rake in even more cash.

                            • 1 vote
                            Reply#23 - Fri Jan 20, 2012 9:23 AM EST

                            That's why when I play slots (a few bucks and just for fun) I prefer the old fashioned ones over video slots. Each tumbler will always display its icons in the same order every play. Video w/ a virtual tumbler? Yeah, sure.

                            Way back in the days of the original Nintendo I noticed that when playing sports games agianst a computer opponent, computer players were always faster than your human controlled players. I couldn't get people to understand that it was still a form of cheating if the parameters could be changed to favor the computer opponent. In video poker, you're trusting that the generation of cards is truly random when done by a computer that can simultaneously "know" the hands of each player as it deals. That is a significant amount of trust to place in strangers.

                              #23.1 - Fri Jan 20, 2012 10:21 AM EST
                              Reply

                              These clowns remind me of the 911 caller recently in this area. Called 911 because the neighborhood crack dealer ripped him off and didn't give him enough crack for his money. Guess who went to jail on that one?

                              • 1 vote
                              Reply#24 - Fri Jan 20, 2012 9:32 AM EST

                              How come I can't post here

                                Reply#25 - Fri Jan 20, 2012 9:51 AM EST

                                Maybe you did'nt Ante.

                                • 2 votes
                                #25.1 - Fri Jan 20, 2012 9:53 AM EST
                                Reply

                                Never mind

                                  Reply#26 - Fri Jan 20, 2012 9:52 AM EST
                                  Jump to discussion page: 1 2 3
                                  You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                                  As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.