E-mail updates
Follow on Twitter
Subscribe to RSS
Manuel Pedraza / AFP - Getty Images file
View of the Hotel Caribe in Cartagena, Colombia, where a prostitution scandal involving U.S. Secret Service agents erupted in April 2012.
Two U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration agents “facilitated a sexual encounter” between a prostitute and a U.S. Secret Service agent days before President Barack Obama visited Colombia for a summit meeting in April 2012, according to a Justice Department investigation obtained exclusively by NBC News.
A summary of the findings of the investigation, included in a Dec. 20 letter from the Justice Department’s Office of the Inspector General to Sens. Joseph Lieberman and Susan Collins, indicated that a third DEA agent present on the night of the incident was not involved in procuring the prostitute for the Secret Service agent.
“While DEA agent #3 was present for a dinner that took place earlier that evening with the USSS agent and the other two DEA agents, he was not present in the residence when the sexual encounter took place and played no role in facilitating it,” the summary said.
All three DEA special agents admitted that they had paid for sexual services of a prostitute, the investigation also found, and “used their DEA Blackberry devices to arrange such activities.” In addition, the report says the agents tried to destroy incriminating information or initially lied to investigators about the incidents. All three agents have high-security clearances.
The summary concluded that the agents’ actions did not warrant criminal prosecution. It said the U.S. Attorney’s Office also “declined to initiate legal proceedings.” It said the case had been referred to the DEA for “action it determines to be appropriate.”
In a letter sent Wednesday to DEA Administrator Michele Leonhart, Collins, R-Maine, called the findings “troubling” and the conclusion that law enforcement officials obstructed the OIG investigation “deeply troubling.” She also asked Leonhart to explain why – nearly four months after the Office of the Inspector General referred the matter to the DEA -- “It is my understanding that those administrative actions are still pending.”
In a statement, DEA spokesman Rusty Payne said, "The Drug Enforcement Administration takes these matters very seriously. Any allegations of misconduct or wrongdoing by DEA personnel are thoroughly investigated and then reviewed by DEA's Board of Professional Conduct for any disciplinary action warranted. This matter is currently under review by the Board of Professional Conduct."
A DEA official, speaking on condition of anonymity, first said that while senior officials learned of the OIG’s findings in September, the agency was not allowed to act until the OIG concluded and presented its findings on Dec. 20. Later, the official acknowledged that that was not correct and that the OIG had officially referred its findings on Sept. 17.
Sources briefed on the scandal have told NBC News that approximately a dozen members of the Secret Service security detail hit the clubs of Cartagena on the evening of April 11, 2012, for a night of drinking that ended with them bringing women back to their hotel rooms.
Some of the women received money, and others did not ask for any, but in one case, an agent refused to pay, and the woman summoned a police officer. That led to an angry encounter that resulted in the debauchery becoming public.
The scandal led to the resignation or retirement of nine of 12 implicated Secret Service employees. Three others were cleared of serious misconduct but still could be disciplined.
The Pentagon also launched an investigation of a dozen military members in connection with the scandal. No disciplinary action has been announced as a result of that investigation.
Lisa Myers is NBC News' senior investigative correspondent; Mike Brunker is an NBC News investigations editor.
More from Open Channel:
- Rossen Reports: Metal water bottles can endanger kids
- John Brennan, Obama's pick for CIA director, has deep roots at agency
- Accusation, suicide cast shadow over Notre Dame's return to glory
Follow Open Channel from NBCNews.com on Twitter and Facebook
Leave a Comment:
No surprise here crooked drug cops all the way
Are secret service agents so desperate that they need to go to prostitutes? Can't they have real girlfriends?
Finally found a useful role for the DEA!!
I'm glad to see the departments are finally working together instead of constantly competing!
justme123... lol
Why do you need both males and females in these positions? This is why. A women who brought a man to her room, paid for or not, would have been fired by now and disgraced forever. This double standard keeps us women from being this stupid. Plus, we tend to not be as loose with our sex partners as our male counterparts. But as long as boys are allowed to be boys and hang out exclusively with other boys, testosterone poisoning commences and stupidity ensues.
drug cops are some of the lowest of the low.
womens studies 101 ftw
Geeze, Banana, I thought you were a guy. You look just like Romney. Not bad for a guy, but a pretty damn ugly woman. Your momma should be shot for allowing you to live.
Like this is a surprise, everyone knows that drugs and hookers go hand in hand , like peas and carrots !
So, did they pay these prostitutes in USD, or in Ecstasy?
Sorry, but the DEA being involved in this, just left that one, too wide open, to pass up the opportunity for a bit of a joke there....
Gives new meaning to one hand washes the other
I'm sorry. I couldn't get a prostitute, ever. But, a Columbian? My unit would rot off! No thanks.
If they were off duty at the time, I dont guess any rules were broken. Just a bunch of stiffnecked moral outrage............
So, what is your point? Who cares? Don't you people have anything to do like, let's say work?
...and did the Administration fire them all on the spot as promised in Obama's zero tolerance speech?
Wonder if the DEA agents got a cut from the pro?
It's widely known DEA agents are the most crooked people on the planet. No news here.
I assumed hookers have been agents for 50+ years. Just like 10% of homeless. Or bartenders.
More importantly tho:
Aren't things the Secret Service does supposed to be a secret?
Who leaked this? Idiots.
It was a DOZEN members of Obama's Security detail......how many of these "hand-picked" agents does Obama travel with???
Come on Mr. "big eared "Prez" you said you had zero tolerance. Oh yeh. you never mean what you say. They should have been fired. In any other military or paramilitary organization they would have been dumped. Guess they must have it in good with the "Prez". Oh and Theo, it must be O.K. to have zero ethics, morals or professional standards, let along organizational smarts. You must tell the wife you love her and when you take her to Jamaica, all bets are off because prostitution and drugs are legal there. GIVE ME BREAK egghead.
Alot. You can't imagine how much security preparation is involved in presidential travel. That's what it takes to protect the Leader of the Free World. I'm old enough to remember the Kennedy assassination and the attempts on Reagan. Hard enough giving our President the protection he needs here at home, let alone abroad.
My hat's off to the Secret Service. They do a heck of a job. And, each and every one of them will take a bullet in protecting our presidents--regardless of party.
Gee - I guess that we should recruit boy scouts for the DEA. After all - we all know that the drug dealers (monitored by the DEA) will just pat them on the ass and send them back home (in a box). The DEA must associate with the lowest of the low to gather information. For some reason, they can never get drug dealer info at churches. And now it shocks people that they know the hookers that the drug dealers use?
the-chief - Wow you've got quite the imagination there! I didn't see anything in the story about Jamaica, or wives. And try reading the story with comprehension - they were fired. And the size of the president's ears has exactly what to do with your point?
Funny how righteous righties get about lying about sex and how accepting they are about lying about WMD's to get us into a war which kills thousands of our soldiers, tens of thousands of civilians and bankrupts the country. Where were your concerns about morals and ethics and professional standards back then?
Egghead
the-chief - BTW you do understand what "twelve agents resigned or retired" means don't you.
The Keystone Cops and the Secret Circus Strike Again LMAO!
These guys can't do anything right
who gives a hoot hoot hoot...0-0...
A bunch of guys wanted to get laid in a country where prostitution is not only legal but widespread, and you lunatics are having a fit of moral outrage? What, somehow this country where sexuality of every kind is a sport is suddenly becoming a nation of chastity obsessed prudes? This post is full of a bunch of pompous, sanctimonious as#ho$es!!
ROTFLMAO!!!!!!!
This administration is an abject embarrassment.
And we wonder why we lost 4 brave American's in Benghazi.
I know, let's just pay the Secret Service and DEA more money, that's the usual Liberal solution, that'll fix it.
Even the stupidest DEA agent is a brain compared to the idiots at the TSA.....
There's absolutely no discipline in this administration as we have witnessed so many times. This is beyond the scope of their agenda and serves no purpose in obtaining it.
Really? Women don't just "sleep around"? LOL! You, maybe not. I don't know you. Maybe you are one of the few honest women out there. But, most women I know, have cheated on their husbands/boyfriends multiple times. I know quite a few that have been with over 5 dozen men. Plus all the stories my military friends tell me about the women in their unit and how they (the women) enjoy sleeping around with as many of them as possible. Don't just blame men. Women are just as bad.
Then by all means, lets give Obama the power to hire and fire at will. But then you'd whine about him having too much power. He doesn't have the authority to fire DEA agents, or military members, or even his own Secret Service. These are organizations with their own internal structures and disciplinary procedures that have to be followed. Best he can do is tell the head of those organizations what he'd like to happen. They are free to agree or to tell him to pack sand.
Sorry you'd rather just mouth off with yet another pathetic Obama rant instead of thinking logically. Any opportunity to bad mouth, right?
PIMPS AND DRUG DEALERS enforcing the law...
Don't you feel safer???
How safe will you be from these agents when we have no guns?
They are above the laws they are to enforce. They have no problem putting you in jail for such actions but in their empowered minds they are above the laws...
SURE YOU CAN TRUST YOUR
GOVERNMENT TO TURN IN YOUR GUNS
Just ask the Aboriginal People
of this land how that worked out for them.
Never
trust a Government that WANTS YOUR GUNS AND MONEY and has a HISTORY OF GENOCIDE
“TO RESIST TYRANNY IS TO SERVE GOD”
When the Government lays down all their arms....I'll think about
doing the same
WHEN DHS RETURNS ALL 1.6
BILLION HOLLOW POINT BULLETS I'll
think about doing the same
When there is disarmament of
over 100,000 Federal Bureaucrats using unconstitutional powers
I'll think about doing the same
When the police are unarmed
I'll think about doing the same
When the IRS is unarmed
When the TSA is ABOLISHED
When the ATF is abolished
When the DEA is abolished
When the NSA is unarmed and
limited powers
When the EPA is abolished
When the CIA cannot operate on
American soil or against Americans
When the FDA actually works for
the people
When the GOVERNMENT FEARS THE
AMERICAN VOTER AS MUCH AS THE AMERICAN SHOOTER
THEN I WILL THINK ABOUT TURNING
IN MY ARMS! ONLY, THINK ABOUT!
AMENDMENT II
"A well regulated
Militia, being necessary to the security of a Free State, the right of the
people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."
*SHALL NOT BE
INFRINGED*…END OF SUBJECT
'sheepled'...
calm down man, you are wrapped a little tight. No one wants your gun now, or in the future. Actions will be taken to make it more difficult for whackos to get guns. So if you are not a whacko (which is debatable based on your 1.34 ramblings) chill my brutha!
It's a stressful job, occasionally you need a little strange!
Men paying for sex in a country where it is legal to do so.
Nothing to see here folks, please keep moving, keep moving.........
I beg to differ!! Cops need to act is a proper manner buying a hooker is not it. They also used government equipment to arrange it!
The general public has a very distorted view of what these people do for a living. They risk their lives 24-7 to deal with the most dangerous criminals in the world, lay it on the line to protect the namby-pamby idiots that get up every day and go sit behind a desk to look muy importante. If these guys want a little pussy once in a while, I say no problem with that.
Let's assume it was done on their own time, where it was legal, with their own money. Then what exactly is improper about it?
So it ok to buy sex but it's not ok to smoke a herb? morals that we all can live bye i get it now'' I've seen the light'' paying for sex is good ,smoking a plant is the evil. lmao .
I agree, marijuana prohibition is absurd.
Theo,
Its not the act of sex that is the problem, These are secret services agents doing there job in a foreign country and getting drunk and allowing hookers in there rooms, when they are on PROTECTION detail again PROTECTION detail and have the presidents movements and times and places , What a perfect target he would have made ! sometime you people have no sense about what kind of world we live in !
You know what I find ironic, to say the very least about all of this? As much as some might talk of cops living up to a higher standard, and especially when this argument comes from politicians; one can almost retort back "like the standard the politicians themselves follow?" When talk of national security is brought up, one can ask "so is a President's sex scandals less an issue of national security?" The list could go on with that one from Bill Clinton, to John F. Kennedy is said to have slept around, even going as far back as Thomas Jefferson himself. Yes, our fore fathers and framers of the Constitution were reported to have been involved in sex scandals, some of these people having gone on to become President themself, while history also records a few skelatons that were in their closets.
Looking at Congress, it comes much the same. If we started digging around these people's lives looking for something we could accuse them with on moral grounds, I'm rather certain that more then a handful of people in Congress would be sitting in the judgement seat right about now. There's almost an air of "do as I say, and not as I do" about this whole matter. Sex scandals and politics is a very old joke in this country, and as much as one might see hearings in Congress on the matter; this is not something that politicians, and yes even Presidents have been above, themselves.
There's an old saying for this apparent hypocracy that can come out of all this, something about people living in glass houses, not throwing stones. Would all these politicians who can be ready to hold a standard for appointees, that elected officials don't always seem apt to live up to themselves, be all that thrilled if the media started a bit of investigative journalism and a bit of what used to be called "muck raking" into seeing just what affairs, what lies, what matters of "cheating" either in their marriages, financially, by insider trading, or what have you, could be dug up on members of Congress? Because all too often, not everyone in politics who might lead the charge and launch the investigation, is not always all that clean, from a moral standpoint themselves.
All arguments of a protection detail (well the President is also the Commander and Chief of the armed services, someone an enemy combatant could have value in compromising, if we want to argue hypotheticals) aside; why does it seem much of the time that appointees are held to a higher standard then elected officials? And in fact excuses can be made for elected officials, as if we've so come to expect improprieties and a level of dishonesty and less then moral behavior from our elected officials, that people seem almost ready to give the elected officials a free pass, where other officials they wouldn't extend the same liscense, in such indiscretions and even outright scandals, if you will.... Should the President, and members of Congress, govenors, etc really be held to the lesser standard in all of this?
WOW...they figured out that men serving away from home engage services of prostitutes....and this is news. I hate to burst the secret but this has gone on since before there even was a United States of America.
As long as its on thier time at their expense....who cares.
At any price its still cheaper than a wife or girlfriend.
Azrancher
I sure hope your wife or girlfriend gets tested for std's or aids, cause nothing says I love you than a giving your partner a disease ! such a stand up person you are !
and NO when you are on protection detail on foreign soil YOU are ALWAYS on duty and your stupid judgement can get our elected officials KILLED ! which is probably why you were never hired for a special assignment because its not about YOU, its about the person your protecting and when you get back home then its your time and then you could bang hookers 5 at a time if you want, but that women standing behind you holding that knife is about to chop off your nuts, so think before you act or for that matter shoot off your mouth with stupid selfish comments !
I know - let's all just follow the laws that we agree with, and ignore the ones that we don't agree with. I don't like the speed limit or stop signs - so you fools better watch out.
Or do we want the DEA to enforce the laws that they are told to enforce? Maybe we should demand that the DEA agents in foreign countries to wear a sign around their necks that identify their agency?
It takes a special type of moron to post that federal agents risking their lives for you is 'bad' or that they are enforcing the wrong laws. These guys put their lives on the line every day. This while you cowards whine and post on newsvine.
@interested observer
how about u just stfu?
This would never happen under a Democratic administration. They go for the foot tappers. Oh, sorry, this is a Democratic administration. My point, if this was a Republican administration, the pro-welfare leeches would be out in force screaming.
The ONLY problem with your statement I've seen, is the FACT that they were OFF DUTY when this occurred. And it was days BEFORE the POTUS arrived. It might help to read and understand what your reading before posting.
You've never lived until you've smoked a hooker and f*cked a bag of marijuana. It's amazing!
LMAO @Chris from Yucaipa
stupid repuplicons :
I see your handle and agree you are stupid ! since its obvious you have no idea what your talking about. let me explain it again for the slow !
When your on a Protection detail you are ALWAYS on duty until the president leaves the country, since I know you have no law enforcement background or you wouldn't have claimed to know what you are talking about, try watching the history channel about the secret services and expand your mind, watching the kardasians is not doing anything for you !
One idiot actually thought she was @!$%#ing for free. You pay them to leave and because he didn't some good men lost their jobs.
Mike-
Glad that you THINK you know me so well and are quick to insulting. Do shifts NOT end? Do they work 24/7? And as for the Kardasians, LOL, I can't stand people like them. So you like to jump to conclusions instead of having an adult conversation and just talking about the article. This will be the ONLY time I respond to an arrogant/ignorant a$$ like yourself. Have a good day!
But hey, let's let the criminal cops be the only ones with guns.
To those of you who fail to see the problem with agents from the DEA and Secret Service hiring prostitutes, the problem is this. These are highly sensitive positions that require one to have a security clearance. Before you are even granted a security clearance, you must agree to, in writing, certain prohibitions on your behavior, whether it's on or off duty, whether it's legal or illegal. You can bet that hiring prostitutes, even if it's legal and off duty, is clearly prohibited. These agents KNEW they were violating the terms of their security clearances and they knew that the grounds for those violations was immediate termination employment. I'm sorry to break it to you, but they don't have a leg to stand on.
Solution to the problem: hire some female Secret Service and DEA agents who have passed all the requisite security clearances to take care of the guys when they're so far from home for so long. Anabanana, you up to the job babe? You seem to have a good grasp (get it?) on why female agents are sooo needed. ;-)
Flame On!
"Only the best" or so the applicants are told when applying to the SS, BATFE, DEA, etc.
I guess that means they get "only the best" pimps and ho's.
MIB Will Smith (Edwards) "Y'boy, Captain America over here! 'Best of the best of the best, sir!' ... 'With honors.' Yeah, he's just really excited and he has no clue why we're here."
The few...the proud...the morally bankrupt. I get all warm an fuzzy knowing that these agencies are protecting my safety and that of my country.
For those of you who really believe in the credibility of the work such organizations are doing, please send an extra couple of hundred dollars withyour tax return this year to support their continued efforts in futility and discrace. With your support, there is not telling what levels of depravity they may sink to in the future...go Amerika (sic)!!!
Remove the 'K' out of America, you disrespectful dumb sh17. Like you're so morally superior. Let's dig around through your closet.
Not condoning what the agents did IF IN FACT they jeopardized any national security. Just questioning all the "moral outrage" coming from a NATION full of doping, alcoholic, promiscuous, whore-mongering internet cry babies. Discipline the agents based upon legal/procedural infractions, and quit using the moral high ground and "higher standards" bullsh17 you use because you're not a member of the gang. Chances are, your idea of morality is different than mine. What if I called for your firing or legal prosecution based on my idea of moral turpitude?
Here's an idea: since all the governmental agents and police officers are pulled from a pool of people called "the American public" how about we all try to fix our own moral failings, to give a higher quality pool from which to hire the agents and police officers in the future. Duh, didn't think about that, did you little bigot?
It's so ridiculous, these clowns can get hired by a branch of the DoJ, but because I smoked a little pot 10 years ago, I get automatically disqualified.
Right. The secret is, don't get caught before you apply.
Didn't get caught, it's on the employment questionnaire, and I have no interested in being jailed for perjury if they decide to give me a poly.
Once your caught and dumb enough to plead guilty
then Keep on smokin..Fluck umm
You broke the law; they didn't.
Hey, you qualify for the office of president though (e.g.: Bush, Obama). How does the double standard feel now?
People with "high security clearances" lying to the investigators. I'll bet their momma's are proud of them.
In military circles at least, there's a term to cover just this. Plausable deniability.... Technically it's not lieing, but it's also not offering up anymore information then the person afore hand knew to ask for as well... The famous old "I can neither confirm, nor deny the verasity of..." fill in the blank, is a classic
Usually, lies are what prevent DEA applicants from being hired and what gets them fired after being hired. FYI, smoking a joint or 2 in high school or college, by itself, does not disqualify a DEA applicant, but lying about it does. Honesty is the best policy for getting and keeping a job at the DEA.
Isn't that pimping or something?????
These people are supposed to be protecting us!!! Looks like they are doing it with their pants down. The sad part is that they believe that because of who they are they are above all else and can do whatever they want.
They aren't supposed to be protecting us. They are supposed to protect the president. I say, let them all fall asleep on this job.
If by "let them all fall asleep on this job" you're saying what I think you're saying, you might want to think again. Because hinting at that sort of thing, can make one a person of interest to another agency with a 3 letter acronym, that under the expanded powers of the Patriot Act could leave them searching online communications to see if there's anything more...
Lets just say, it's best not even to go there ;) Personally, I wouldn't even joke about that sort of thing, especially given the post-9/11 climate where even an infant can get groped at an air port....
Your comment is disgusting and disturbing.
What do you do for a living, judgement guy? Sit behind a computer all day and complain and rear down everyone else....
They were off duty & doing what is legal in that country. After a stressful day, nothing better that a hottie for relaxation. Even self-rightous prudes partake, but are rarely caught.
Finally, the DEA does something useful for somebody.
With all the piles of money we spend on that agency, drug use hasn't fallen at all. They prop up the prices by putting kinks in the supply chain, sure, but as the prices rise the supply resumes and a whole bunch of people get shot in the ensuing gang warfare. Your tax dollars at work.
Nice to see they finally helped someone.
Fuel for the wingnut fire. There are too many real issues this country needs to focus on without these little dumb ass distractions.
disgusting.
OPMG that's horrible! Makes, Afghanistan, global warming and the budget deficit pale in comparison.
What else is new.? We are all getting screwed.
Who says there's no cross-agency collaboration in America?
Hey Al... I didn't read to post #14 when I posted 1.3
you get the 1st great mind thinks alike award (imho!)
douche bag Lieberman is involved... this smells simply because of him... he sucks, he has served Israel, NOT THE AMERICAN PEOPLE!!!
I totally agree with you re: Lieberman.
Lieberman is one of the BIGGEST problem with the US deficit!
Here comes the Moralistic Nanny Squad again!
Scum all around. I'm all for legalizing hooking here in the States. However this crime reflects the low moral character of our current crop of thugverment agents. None will be fired from their overpaid jobs. Count on it.
Crime? They even stated above that this was NOT a crime.
And what is "Morally" wrong about intercourse? Hope they don't get fired for doing what is legal over there AND in parts of the US. Get off your high horse and join the rest of us in reality.
THE LOST CHILDREN
In New York City, a 1994 audit conducted by the Office of the Comptroller
found that the Child Welfare Administration had incorrect addresses listed in
the official record for 20 percent of the foster children in its care.[1]
That represents 12,000 children out of about 60,000 in foster care that City
caseworkers can not immediately locate.[2]
Auditors also found that: "Five percent of the children in care were listed
as living at the CWA headquarters at 80 Lafayette St., even though more than
half of those children had been in foster care for more than two years."[3]
The agency directly responsible for these children had listed 2,574 of them
as residing at its own headquarters.[4]
According to a 1996 report: "A significant number of records in the CCRS
database reflects inaccurate information, including out-of-date or inaccurate
addresses, which affects CWA's ability to locate children quickly."
Based on earlier research conducted by the Office of the Comptroller, the
following conditions were found to relate to the 50,702 children then in the
tracking system database:
children in homes supervised by voluntary agencies have incorrect addresses
listed;
addresses listed;
Just how many children may actually be "lost" in the system at any given
moment? According to Comptroller Alan G. Hevesi:
Another 1996 review included a random selection of 195
cases, of which auditors could not locate four case files. Two of the four were
closed according to the data base; another was an active case; and the remaining
record was "signed out" to a CWA Deputy Commissioner who denied having the file.
Auditors found file folders lying on floors and in unlabeled and haphazardly
arranged cartons.[6]
As of December of 1996, New York City was still in the planning stages for a
computer database of abuse and neglect cases, still logging them manually on
index cards.[7]
News reporter Anna Quindlen spent a morning with volunteers and staff members
of Court Appointed Special Advocates, volunteers who are assigned by Family
Court judges to look out for the interests of some of the children in New York
City's foster care system.
Quindlen describes their role in trying to locate the lost children: "They
are on the phone constantly, trying to track kids who often get lost in the
labyrinth of foster care, which is full of dead ends. Think about what it takes
to get a straight answer out of any government bureaucracy; multiply that by 10
and that is their job."[8]
slow news day this qualifies as a "scoop"
I sure hope they aren't allowed to have guns, lol
That's what I like to see. Good cooperation between our government agencies. Keep up the good work, fellas!
Nice to know my tax dollars are hard at work!
YOUR tax dollars paid for the hookers? Are they NOT allowed to spend THEIR earned income as they want?
NO they are not allowed to spend their money on what they want. Can you purchase a hooker legally?...they cannot either.
Defending them becasue maybe you frequent hookers yourself?
I for one believe that like in Germany prostitution should be legal and regulated for many reasons, public health and safety to those that are drawn to that life style. Reduce rape and other sexually frustrated ppl from acting out in violence towards women.
But until then... it is illegal, no differnt than purchasing drugs for personal use illegal.
It is illegal in SOME parts of the US. Not All. Is prostitution illegal in Las Vegas? And FYI, never been with a hooker. Don't trust them. But I do defend other peoples rights to do as they wish. (Legality is ONLY what we make of it, it's not an absolute)
Yes, prostitution IS illegal in Las Vegas but legal in a few COUNTIES in Nevada.
Perhaps some folks are happy with the obese pig they married and will bite the obeast bullet and never have contentual sex again.
I prefer a smart working girl than a merkin pig any day or night.
I love to see examples of inter-agency cooperation. As long as there are no sloppy seconds!!
Just wait until we hear about King Hussein's hooker. He'll just deny, deny, deny, like his mentor BillyBob Clinton, but we'll all know it to be true. Think Moochelle will stand by him like that snatch Hillary did? Took one for the team, she did.
catlover589 Comment collapsed by the community
Just wait until we hear about King Hussein's hooker. He'll just deny, deny, deny, like his mentor BillyBob Clinton, but we'll all know it to be true. Think Moochelle will stand by him like that snatch Hillary did? Took one for the team, she did.
You mean Billy Jeff.
I used to live near DC and employed the wife of a secret service agent attached to the White House. You have no idea what goes on according to what she told me.
That Would Not Surprise me...When your up that high
laws don't apply ..unless your caught..Red Handed
SURE YOU CAN TRUST YOUR
GOVERNMENT TO TURN IN YOUR GUNS
Just ask the Aboriginal People
of this land how that worked out for them.
Never
trust a Government that WANTS YOUR GUNS AND MONEY and has a HISTORY OF GENOCIDE
“TO RESIST TYRANNY IS TO SERVE GOD”
When the Government lays down all their arms....I'll think about
doing the same
WHEN DHS RETURNS ALL 1.6
BILLION HOLLOW POINT BULLETS I'll
think about doing the same
When there is disarmament of
over 100,000 Federal Bureaucrats using unconstitutional powers
I'll think about doing the same
When the police are unarmed
I'll think about doing the same
When the IRS is unarmed
When the TSA is ABOLISHED
When the ATF is abolished
When the DEA is abolished
When the NSA is unarmed and
limited powers
When the EPA is abolished
When the CIA cannot operate on
American soil or against Americans
When the FDA actually works for
the people
When the GOVERNMENT FEARS THE
AMERICAN VOTER AS MUCH AS THE AMERICAN SHOOTER
THEN I WILL THINK ABOUT TURNING
IN MY ARMS! ONLY, THINK ABOUT!
AMENDMENT II
"A well regulated
Militia, being necessary to the security of a Free State, the right of the
people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."
*SHALL NOT BE
INFRINGED*…END OF SUBJECT
THE LOST CHILDREN
In New York City, a 1994 audit conducted by the Office of the Comptroller
found that the Child Welfare Administration had incorrect addresses listed in
the official record for 20 percent of the foster children in its care.[1]
That represents 12,000 children out of about 60,000 in foster care that City
caseworkers can not immediately locate.[2]
Auditors also found that: "Five percent of the children in care were listed
as living at the CWA headquarters at 80 Lafayette St., even though more than
half of those children had been in foster care for more than two years."[3]
The agency directly responsible for these children had listed 2,574 of them
as residing at its own headquarters.[4]
According to a 1996 report: "A significant number of records in the CCRS
database reflects inaccurate information, including out-of-date or inaccurate
addresses, which affects CWA's ability to locate children quickly."
Based on earlier research conducted by the Office of the Comptroller, the
following conditions were found to relate to the 50,702 children then in the
tracking system database:
children in homes supervised by voluntary agencies have incorrect addresses
listed;
addresses listed;
Just how many children may actually be "lost" in the system at any given
moment? According to Comptroller Alan G. Hevesi:
Another 1996 review included a random selection of 195
cases, of which auditors could not locate four case files. Two of the four were
closed according to the data base; another was an active case; and the remaining
record was "signed out" to a CWA Deputy Commissioner who denied having the file.
Auditors found file folders lying on floors and in unlabeled and haphazardly
arranged cartons.[6]
As of December of 1996, New York City was still in the planning stages for a
computer database of abuse and neglect cases, still logging them manually on
index cards.[7]
News reporter Anna Quindlen spent a morning with volunteers and staff members
of Court Appointed Special Advocates, volunteers who are assigned by Family
Court judges to look out for the interests of some of the children in New York
City's foster care system.
Quindlen describes their role in trying to locate the lost children: "They
are on the phone constantly, trying to track kids who often get lost in the
labyrinth of foster care, which is full of dead ends. Think about what it takes
to get a straight answer out of any government bureaucracy; multiply that by 10
and that is their job."[8]
oh yes, the ole' scratch my back, i scratch yours.
The DEA guys spent their time 'ON THE CLOCK' so to speak, looking for a hooker...wow, our taxdollars hard at work, huh? These clowns belong in jail!
They were not on the clock"so to speak". The president had not yet even arived in Columbia. I find it kinda weird that so many are 'outraged' that a guy wants to get laid on his own time. Outragous!! lmao